I interrupted my movie to do what everyone does nowadays when they have a question. I typed, “what comes after HD?” into Google and began skimming through the results. I came across a technology blog with a post that matched my question. The author of the blog, Christopher Null, listed a few possible technologies that could potentially surpass the HD-DVD.
Lasers have evolved since the first “red lasers” used in CDs and DVDs. Our current Blu Rays and HD DVDs use a “blue laser” which has a shorter-wavelength laser beam, making it possible to pack more data onto a disc. Null says that the next step up would be an “ultraviolet laser,” which could put up to 500 gigabytes onto a disc.
Another possibility still uses lasers, but in a completely different way. Null says that,
Holographic data storage uses lasers to store information in multi-dimensional space instead of just two dimensions, like current optical discs. Theoretically, capacity could be about one trillion bits in a cubic centimeter of storage material, or about 125GB per cc, and maybe a terabyte on something roughly the size of a standard DVD.Imagine the quality of picture and sound a movie could have if storage capacity is practically limitless.
Flash is a technology that shoves lasers to the side. Researchers have developed a “terabyte thumb drive” that is smaller and more durable than any optical media. As of now pricing is a concern for the technology but Null says that he wouldn’t be surprised if studios start releasing movies on Flash cards by the year 2012.
After researching the technologies in development. It’s hard to think that HD DVD and Blu Ray will be the end. Technology never seems to stop moving forward, capitalizing on itself. I’m happy with my Blu Ray technology now, I’ll try not to think about what new hardware I’ll have to buy next year to "keep up with the Joneses."
Even when technology advances to the next stage of media storage, WHY would we need endless area of storage on one device? Really, I can only slightly tell any difference between HD and non-HD on a standard television. (and I have a 42" HD tv soooo...) Is there a point when the only reason to advance even more pixels into a movie would be so that you can show it on larger and larger screens flawlessly? When an age comes that watching movies on the big screen theaters is just as flawless in every square inch as a regular sized HD tv now? Otherwise, how else would it matter? My shows are pretty flawless now, and the video games are things that technologists a decade ago only dreamed of. Compare Final Fantasy 7 to 13....
ReplyDelete